Xiadong Bharat Continuous Stiffness Review Sciencedirect

Abstract

Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were performed to examine the continuous stiffness measurements (CSM) and nanoindentation behavior at 300 K temperature for body-centered cubic molybdenum (Mo). The nanomechanical behavior was examined by using a spherical indenter and the values of elastic modulus and hardness were extracted. In the nanoindentation model, we made use of a sinusoidal load in order to obtain the dynamical properties such as storage modulus, mechanical damping factor, and loss modulus. Open visualization tool (OVITO) was used to visualize the dislocation analysis, to track the indenter depth and grains response to the applied load. Dislocation loops were generated and found an increase in their areas as the indenter penetrated deep into the sample. This work provides useful insights toward a broad understanding of the structural, nano-mechanical, and damping properties of pure Mo.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

39,95 €

Price includes VAT (Indonesia)

References

  1. Motta A T, Couet A, Comstock R J Annu Rev Mater Res 45 (2015) 311.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  2. Kiran K N A P, Szpunar J A Mater Sci Eng A 528 (2011) 6366.

    Article  Google Scholar

  3. Nordlund K, Zinkle S J, Sand A E, Granberg F, Averback R S, Stoller R E, Suzudo T, Malerba L, Banhart F, Weber W J, Willaime F, Dudarev S L, Simeone D J Nuc Mat 512 (2018) 450.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  4. Kilymis, Delaye D A, Ispas S J Che Phy 145 (2016) 044505.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  5. Kim J H, Lee M H, Choi B K, Jeong Y H J Alloys Compd 431 (2007) 155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  6. Plimpton S J Comput Phys 117 (1995) 1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  7. Stukowski A Mod Sim Mat Sci and Engg 18 (2010) 015012.

    Article  Google Scholar

  8. Chen C, Deng Z, Tran R, Tang H, Chu I, Ong S Phy rev mat 1 (2017)043603

    Google Scholar

  9. Yunxing Z, Chen C, Xiangguo L, Zhi D, Yiming C, Jorg B, Gabor C, Alexander VS, Aidan PT, Mitchell AW, Shyue PO (2020) J Phys Chem A, 124: 731

  10. Mustafa M A, Qingyu W & Zubair M Sains Malaysiana 48 (2019) 2039.

    Article  Google Scholar

  11. Grønbech J N Mol Phys 1080 (2019) 1e25.

    Google Scholar

  12. Youngmin L, Jong Y P, Sung Y K, Sukky J, Seyoung I Mech Mat 37 (2005) 1035–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar

  13. Domínguez G F J, Papanikolao S, Esfandiarpour, Sobkowicz P, Alava Mat Sci Engg A 826 (2021) 141912.

    Article  Google Scholar

  14. Fu T, Peng X, Chen X, Weng S, Hu N, Li Q, and Wang Z Sci Rep 6 (2016) 35665.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  15. Gottstein G, Shvindlerman L S CRC Press, Boca Raton FL (1999).

  16. Zhang H, David J S, Jack F D, James A W Acta Materialia 55 (2007) 4527–4533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  17. Rodriguez J, Rico A, Otero E, Rainforth W M Acta Materialia 57 (2009) 3148–3156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  18. Qianhua K, Wenyi Y, Guozheng K, Qingping S J Mech Phys Solids 10 (2013) 1016

    Google Scholar

  19. García F, Mairov F, Ceseracciu A, Serruys L, Trocellier Y, Baumier P, Kaïtasov C, Brescia O, Gastaldi R, Vena D, Beghi P, Beck M G, Sridharan L, Di F Scientific Reports 6 (2016) 33478.

    Article  Google Scholar

  20. Srivatsan T S, Ravi B G, Naruka A S, Riester L, Petraroli M, Sudarshan T S Powder Tech 114 (2001) 136–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  21. Sudharshan P P, Oliver W C, Pharr G M 194 Mat Des (2020) 108923.

    Google Scholar

  22. Jiyu S, Wei W, Mingze L, Bharat B, Jin T RSC Adv 82 (2016) 79113.

    Google Scholar

  23. Ranganathan R, Rahmi O, Pawel K Comp Part B: Engg 93 (2016) 273.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  24. Cohen S R, Cohen E K J Nano Tech 4 (2013) 815.

    CAS  Google Scholar

  25. Nemecek J Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.

  26. Durst K, Maier V Curr Opi Sol Stat Mat Sci 19 (2015) 340–353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  27. Amanov A, Pyun Y, Kim J, Sasaki S Appl Surf Sci 08 (2014) 311.

    Google Scholar

  28. Li D Hardness distribution of hardened metal using nanoindentation NANOVEA (2015).

  29. Kossman S, Iost A, Chicot D, Mercier D, Mun˜oz I, Dufre´noy F Y, Magnier V, Cristol A J Mater Sci 54 (2019) 4647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  30. Franke O, Göken M, Meyers M A, Durst K, Hodge A M Mat Sci Engg C 31 (2011) 789–795.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar

  31. Chakravartula A, Komvopoulos K App Phy Lett 88 (2006) 131901.

    Article  Google Scholar

  32. Mangipudi V S, Falsafi A Adh Sci Engg 2 (2002) 75-138.

    CAS  Google Scholar

  33. Wang Q J, Zhu D https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_492

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research work was financially supported by China scholarship council (CSC) and College of Nuclear Science and Technology (CNST), Harbin engineering university (HEU), China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asmat Ullah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ullah, A., Wang, Q., Song, Y. et al. Continuous Stiffness Measurements and Nanoindentation Studies of bcc Mo: An Atomistic Approach. Trans Indian Inst Met 75, 1555–1561 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02524-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-022-02524-6

Keywords

  • Molecular dynamics
  • Spherical indenter
  • OVITO
  • Nanoindenation
  • Dynamic nanoindentation

zapatachither.blogspot.com

Source: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12666-022-02524-6

0 Response to "Xiadong Bharat Continuous Stiffness Review Sciencedirect"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel